do not track buttonBad for marketers, good for the user. Privacy is much more guarante in this way than without the ‘Do Not Track’ function, but is not as disruptive as a cookie wall: the user can surf the internet undisturb, without being bother by annoying notifications and cookie walls. Almost all major browsers already support the ‘Do Not Track’ function. Citizens can easily switch this function on and off. Result? The user decides for himself or herself whether or not to leave non list to data -functional cookies.
Third party services
Require third-party services to adhere to the ‘Do Not Track’ setting for ‘non-functional cookies’. This way, you don’t have to adjust every website, but only those of service providers such as Google Analytics and YouTube and social mia companies such as Flickr, Twitter, Facebook and LinkIn. Many of these companies have already start implementing the ‘Do Not Track’ functions, often with the upcoming American privacy legislation in mind.Additions or im
Report non-functional cookies
Finally, you oblige the website itself to report separately from the third party services if they place non-functional cookies. There are few websites that place non-functional cookies themselves. If they do and do not adhere to the ‘Do Not Track’ setting, then checking this is much easier than checking 1.6 million websites that often place cookies.
And there is the result!
>>>>>>>>Completely in line with European law (see point 25) and also much simpler in the control and implementation of that law. The privacy of the citizen is guarante in a simple way. Moreover, the responsibility lies in the hands of the citizen, who can decide for himself whether or not marketing list he is follow and therefore receives offers via third party services. The user-friendliness is restor: no annoying pop-ups from websites that ask whether they can store your cookies, because they boost your business with a targeted namibia phone number list are legally oblig to do so. The user can simply surf the internet again.